Otherwise you might as well go with something less expensive and use your remaining budget to invest in additional equipment. The EF 50mm 1.2 is also an L-series lens but in order to have adequate weather-resistance, Canon states that you must attach a 72mm filter (sold separately). Take a look, starting at the 70mm end of the zoom range. And that's not to detract one iota from Sigma's accomplishment with their 105 Art, but more to highlight just how incredible the RF 85/1.2L is. You can see how they differ in the real-world examples below. Within the article, there are affiliate links. Note that if you want to de-click it for video use, you must send it to a Canon service centre. Sigma really has come a long way from my early days in photography. Reasons to choose Rokinon 85mm F1.4 over Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG HSM Art. As you can see, it is a telephoto zoom lens with focal length range of 120-300mm and a wide maximum aperture of f/2.8 throughout. Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG DN Art (Sony E-mount) – $1,199, B&H This is a guest review of the Sigma 24mm f/1.4 ART lens by Jay Cassario of Twisted Oak Studios.. The RF and Art lenses show very little by comparison. Almost every photographer has or currently owns a 50mm prime lens. Read our detailed comparison of the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG HSM Art vs Rokinon 85mm F1.4 to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Comparing the three lenses side-by-side, the EF lens is the one that displays the most visible barrel distortion, but to be fair, it is quite contained. The new lens is 500g lighter than Sigma’s previous version Like other Sigma DG DN full-frame mirrorless lenses, of which we’re starting to see a growing number appear, the 85mm F1.4 DG DN stands out in a number of ways from previous Sigma examples and its rivals, which we’ll come onto shortly. In the corners, the RF lens definitely looks smoother than the EF lens, whose bokeh is ravaged by streaky lines. Depending on the the light and conditions, it was sometimes on par with the Canon 24-70 f/2.8L II comparison unit, though no better. The zoom range is the ratio between the longest and shortest focal lengths. Click on the images to see 100% magnificatio… ¿Cuál es la diferencia entre Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG HSM Art y Canon RF 85mm f/1.2L USM? It is my fastest lens I own, at a convenient focal length for most projects. Whereas the RF’s distance scale can only be seen on screen, the EF and Sigma both have a focus distance scale on the barrel inside a small window. On the side of the barrel of each lens, there is a switch to jump between AF and MF. If you buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. There are still potential lock-up issues with these three – firmware updates are expected No one can argue that it's not, so I'm with you. Last updated: January 21, 2019 Go to Comments. 5 advantages. Price. The focus rings of the Sigma and EF lens are somewhat stiffer than that of the RF lens but all three are pleasant and accurate to use. I have never used that particular Sigma lens but a Sigma 50mm f1.4 Art is the ONLY non-Canon lens I currently own and it is a wonderful lens. In this video, Matthew Gore goes in-depth about the similarities and differences between Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L II and Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 ART.Both have a good reputation, and the price difference isn’t really big, which makes the decision not so easy to make. Head2Head: Sigma 50mm F/1.4 DG HSM Art vs Canon 50mm F/1.8 4. If the image quality for this lens lives up to the reputation of previous Art lenses, it’… Between f/5.6 and f/11, you can hardly tell the difference between the RF lens and the Sigma. Earlier this year, Canon announced its first full-frame mirrorless camera, the EOS R, whose new RF mount features a large 54mm diameter and a shorter flange distance than the EF DSLR mount. At f/2.8, the Sigma isn’t far behind the RF lens whereas the EF lens is still much softer. The source also revealed that Sigma won’t be modifying their popular ART lenses to fit the Canon RF mount. Sigma have announced lens compatibility information for their lenses used with the RF mount. This is the closest distance that the lens can focus. Even the EF 50mm 1.2, which is the smallest of the three, can weigh down the EOS R when the adapter is attached. 1. I think many photographers would agree that this is a lot to spend on one lens when there are perfectly valid alternatives out there that won’t break the bank. Weight, 950 grams vs 1200. Ran a few test shots today to compare my RF 35 with my Sigma 35 Art. Overall the Sigma’s bokeh looks more similar to that of the RF lens but it too displays a few streaks. A lower weight is also an advantage for home appliances, as it makes transportation easier, and for many other types of products. There’s just something about that focal length and the wide aperture that appeals to most of us. Once you stop down to f/2.8, the results improve to the point that you can barely see any traces in images taken with the RF lens. Although it is half of a stop slower and doesn’t offer quite the same level of edge-to-edge sharpness, it can still produce very satisfying results even at the fastest apertures. A longer maximum focal length allows you to focus in on a small part of a scene, and offers a narrower angle of view than shorter focal lengths. Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM. As of review time, both the II and Art lenses remain in production and a life expectancy for "II" was "not available". Here again, it becomes clear that the RF 50mm is the superior lens. The RF 50mm f/1.2 was one of four launch-day lenses along with the RF 24-105mm f/4, RF 35mm f/1.8 macro, and the RF 28-70mm f/2. It’s only by turning to the corners that we start to see a few differences emerge. From what I've seen the RF 35/1.8 macro seems generally similar to the EF 35/2 IS (although of course it's a third of a stop faster than the 35/2 IS, meaning the Sigma Art would be only 2/3 of a stop in front), so even if I got an EOS R I'd stick with the Sigma 35 Art. Weight. At a long focus distance at the centre, the three lenses look extremely similar through the aperture range. A little less than an inch, actually. At the fastest apertures, the EF lens displays the worst chromatic aberration of the three in the form of severe purple fringing. Because the Sigma and RF lens have wider focus rings, they are a little easier to turn than the thin ring of the EF lens. In Adobe Lightroom, for example, there is a dedicated tool that does an excellent job of removing all traces of fringing. Being a member of the Canon L-series, it has a weather-resistant design that protects against dust and moisture. I even think that the Sigma lens … Anyone who owns a fast-aperture lens is going to be curious about the quality of the ‘bokeh’ or background blur. Raws converted in Lightroom using a basic import preset using Canon faithful profile and a gentle s-curve. Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art, 35.71% wider aperture at minimum focal length, 1f wider aperture at maximum focal length, RF15-35mm F2.8 L is USM International Model, has a silent focus motor built into the lens. I'm just glad that Sigma made their lenses for L mount which has the same flange distance as RF. The Sigma 20mm f1.4 DG HSM Art is a wide angle prime lens, available in Canon, Nikon, and Sigma mounts. Neither lens is small or lightweight. This is essential when you wish to take photos including far off objects, such as when shooting landscapes, in order to make sure everything is sharp and in focus. Last Update: Here is the updated Canon RF mount lens roadmap 2020 to 2021. When stopped down to f/1.4 and f/1.8, the three look even more similar. 1st August 2018 Written by Thomas; In depth; Quality; Samples; Verdict; In depth. Using over 50 years of lens making experience, particularly the knowledge gained from the 35mm 1.4 Art and the 24mm 1.4 Art, the 20mm 1.4 Art is the widest large aperture Art lens to date. There are traces of green and purple fringing from the RF and Sigma lenses but it isn’t nearly as evident. The Sigma 24mm F/1.4 lens is an interesting choice for astrophotography, particularly wide-angle Milky Way photography.With an f-ratio of F/1.4, this Sigma art series lens can pull in a lot of light under a dark night sky. This Sigma 20mm F1.8 EX DG Aspherical RF is a unique Sigma offering with an aperture of F1.8 making it the fastest super wide angle lens available from any camera or lens manufacturer. The EF is at its sharpest at these values but once again, it remains the softest of the three. Note: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order. I actually picked up the RF 35mm last week. I really think the RF 35mm is being seriously slept on in terms of how great it actually is. When the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens was introduced in 2012, it ushered in a new era of third party lenses, giving users lower cost options while maintaining high image quality and performance. Here’s the whole image: And here’s the center crop. Though RF and Nikon Z are a bit on their own at present, E-Mount and L-Mount, which encompass a huge number of cameras, ... Current Favorite: Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Art Lens. All three have plastic hoods, which are petal-shaped for the RF lens and the Sigma and cylindrical for the EF lens. The same source did say converting current ART series lenses to the RF wasn’t in the cards, and that SIGMA will have a “unique lineup” for the RF mount. The aperture controls how much light gets through to the camera’s sensor. In the case of all three lenses, the best results can be found between f/5.6 and f/11. As always, you can remove chromatic aberration in your favourite post-processing software. According to the official specifications, both the RF lens and the Sigma have a minimum focus distance of 40cm whereas the EF lens is limited to 45cm. Lenses need to be updated to firmware version V2 Turning off DLO is suggested. According to Canon, this mount will allow for “faster and lighter lenses with higher performing optics” than ever before. But it is ever so slightly larger than the Art 40 in diameter and the Art 40 is only about an inch longer. Jul 8, 2017. It's an incredible lens, but its size and weight and likely less snappy autofocus than the RF lens along with similar transmission and a close focal length put it on the red side of that comparison. Sharpness is one of the aspects photographers care about the most, so let’s take a look at how these three primes compare. Even if you’ve only skimmed through this comparison, it should be quite clear which of the three 50mm primes reigns supreme. Sigma vs. Canon: I chose the Sigma 24~70 over Canon because it had IS. When set to their fastest apertures, the RF lens appears to be the creamiest at the centre but only by a very small margin. Tamron SP 90mm F/2__8 Di VC USD 1:1 Macro, Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm F/2__8G IF-ED, Sony 24mm F2 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Distagon T*. And Canon Rumors’s source suggests that Sigma has sped up its original plans for RF lenses, thanks to the interest generated by the EOS R5 announcement. The post Sigma to Release Canon RF Lenses Next Year appeared first on Digital Photography School. It was authored by Jaymes Dempsey. Home > Canon camera lens comparison > Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art. Ethics statement: We borrowed these three lenses to conduct our comparison on the Canon EOS R. We were not asked to write anything about these products, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. You can clearly hear the AF motor at work when using the RF and EF lenses, and the Sigma produces a faint rattling sound. Its also .5 lbs heavier, but I use this lens for video occasionally and am glad now after years of use that I went with it. their image quality is right up there with Nikon, and Canons best, but they run at least 1/3 cheaper. Easy choice given my intended use of the lens. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! For the scenic or landscape photographer it’s important to have a wide angle lens with excellent optical performance and Sigma’s aspherical lens technology provides high quality images for the serious … option in the Digital Lens Optimiser sub-menu. Head2Head: Sigma 50mm F/1.4 DG HSM Art vs Canon 50m F/1.2L 3. And that's not to detract one iota from Sigma's accomplishment with their 105 Art, but more to highlight just how incredible the RF … Cheaper by $820. The EF lens by comparison has a magnification of just 0.15x. The bokeh at 1.4 is far superior however. All three sport a rubberised focus ring but only the RF lens has an extra control ring at the end of the lens to which you can assign various settings such as aperture, shutter, ISO and white balance. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the mirrorless camera lens ranking. and feel you will get a significant return on the investment, would prefer to start a native collection of lenses rather than use an adapter, already own it and would rather not spend the money on either of its rivals, want the best balance between quality and affordability, can be content with “very good” rather than “extreme” sharpness at the fastest apertures or in the corners, don’t mind investing in the EF-EOS R adapter. Feb 22, 2016. Physically, both lenses look similar. 539 g vs … Since there are two new third-party 85mm f/1.4 lenses for full-frame mirrorless systems this year, we thought we’d do a quick comparison to show you how the bokeh compares, and particularly, the look of “bokeh dots” The Contenders | Sigma VS Rokinon Mirrorless 85mm f/1.4 Comparison. Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. Both Sigma and Tamron saw the crack in Canon's armor, and the introduction of the 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art and 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 lenses represent the culmination of those manufacturers' efforts to unseat Canon in the professional general purpose lens market by taking advantage of Canon's biggest shortcoming. In the case of these three primes, the differences aren’t as big as I would have expected. This page is currently only available in English. Sigma 14mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art … However, Sigma is significantly heavier (1020 g/2.24 lbs vs. 850 g/1.8 lbs). The Canon is widely considered the best 50mm you can get for Canon (manual focus Zeiss not included) and so I wanted to see how the new Sigma stacks up. From the beginning I preferred the Sigma lens over the Canon one. An ultra-wide angle lens with an ultra-fast maximum aperture, the 20mm f/1.4 Art lens is one with quite a few applications including; photojournalism, wedding photography, street photography, and landscapes, to name a few. The folks at Mirrorless Comparisons compared the new Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L lens for the EOS R system with the Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L and Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art lenses.. Needless to say it again, likely, but Canon made a highly regarded optical masterpiece with the RF 50mm f/1.2L.A lens that has a serious price but might even been underpriced for what it delivers. The Sony and Zeiss equivalents are priced considerably-higher than this Sigma lens. Overall, the only concrete reason I can see owning the Sigma 105/1.4 | Art for Canon RF exclusively would be price versus the RF 85/1.2L. Lenses with built-in focus motor focus faster and more quietly than lenses without a focus motor which rely on the camera's body focus motor. This ultra wide-angle prime lens with extra fast maximum aperture is perfect for those who focus on events, architectural and landscape photography, situational / environmental portrait, indoor or low light photography, and astrophotography. At the longest end of the lens you get the narrowest angle of view. I really think the RF 35mm is being seriously slept on in terms of how great it actually is. 1st August 2018 Written by Thomas; In depth; Quality; Samples; Verdict; In depth. Announced in October 2015, it’s the widest prime lens in Sigma’s highly acclaimed Art series which so far have all earned our Highly Recommended award; see my Sigma 24mm f1.4 Art review, my Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art review, or my Sigma 50mm f1.4 Art review. The 'Art' series are noticeably better products, but mostly (maybe all) are prime lens's and should be better performers optically than the zoomers. For the SOOC JPGs, you can also enable the Chromatic Aberr. As you can see, the level of detail rendered by the RF lens is quite incredible. Optical image stabilization uses gyroscopic sensors to detect the vibrations of the camera. Current Favorite: Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Art Lens Not only is the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Art remarkably consistent throughout the zoom range and through aperture values, but it’s … On the other hand, Sigma's Art series is highly regarded, and with Canon's RF 85mm f/2, you get 1:2 macro capabilities and built-in image stabilization, making it a highly versatile lens … Sigma 50mm F/1.4 DG HSM … The Sigma 135mm f/1.8 Art Lens' optical performance is comparable to or exceeds the other options and that AF is included gives it a big advantage over a couple of those competing strongly on the optical front. In this particular comparison, we’ve pitted it against two existing fast-aperture 50mm primes for the EF mount, the EF 50mm 1.2 and the Sigma 50mm 1.4 Art, both of which can be used on the EOS R with full compatibility thanks to the EF-EOS R adapter. And I LOVE it. I think their 14-24 and 24-70 F2.8 would make a huge impact. This allows you to fit more of the scene into the photograph (based on APS-C format). Thanks! Another Sigma Art lens you should consider using is the Sigma 20mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art. And I LOVE it. October 22, 2017 The Tamron 35mm f/1.8 Di VC USD was announced years after (and probably as a response to) Sigma’s ART series lens, but it’s not a perfect answer to the lauded Sigma lens. Where Sigma seems to shine with the 'Art' series is is cost. Indeed the adapted lenses are just as snappy as the native RF lens for stills and video shooting. The RF lens maintains a slight advantage over the Sigma at f/2.8 and f/4, and although the EF lens looks a little sharper at these values, it doesn’t come close to either of its rivals. As for vignetting, it is present at the fastest aperture of all three lenses and persists until f/4 (RF lens), f/5.6 (EF lens) and f/4 (Sigma). At the shorter end of the lens you get the widest angle of view. A wide angle lens is great for capturing larger areas of a scene, such as when doing architectural or landscape photography. Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM A. The RF lens also has an additional switch to limit the focus distance. But, unlike Tamron, they turn in the same direction on Sigma and Canon. In general, the Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 ART’s resolution was excellent in the center of the lens. However none of them offer hard stops. Similar to the number of aperture blades, rounded blades affect the way the light gets through to the sensor.